<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>A Life Connected &#187; book review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nonviolenceunited.org/tag/book-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nonviolenceunited.org</link>
	<description>Staying connected with NonviolenceUnited.org</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 17:56:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Book Review: &#8220;Nonviolence: 25 Lessons From The History Of A Dangerous Idea&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.nonviolenceunited.org/2009/11/book-review-nonviolence-25-lessons-from-the-history-of-a-dangerous-idea/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nonviolenceunited.org/2009/11/book-review-nonviolence-25-lessons-from-the-history-of-a-dangerous-idea/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 01:55:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Connector</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Discover Nonviolence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[book]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[book review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nonviolence]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nonviolenceunited.org/?p=184</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There’s no real word for Active Nonviolence. Nonviolence is one of those “non” words &#8212; a &#8220;not&#8221; word. But it is much more than not-violence. It is active, creative, courageous, sometimes complicated, often difficult, organized, and driven. It’s difficult to describe, build, or recognize something that doesn’t have a name. Did the word smiths purposefully [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p id="top" />
<p style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><img src="http://www.nonviolenceunited.org/images/Book_Nonviolence_25Lessons2.jpg" alt="" width="71" height="106" /></p>
<p style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">There’s no real word for Active Nonviolence. Nonviolence is one of those “non” words &#8212; a &#8220;not&#8221; word. But it is much more than not-violence. It is active, creative, courageous, sometimes complicated, often difficult, organized, and driven.</p>
<p style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">It’s difficult to describe, build, or recognize something that doesn’t have a name. Did the word smiths purposefully write Nonviolence out of our language and therefore out of our understanding?</p>
<p style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Even Gandhi struggled with what to call the Nonviolent fight for India’s independence. He announced a contest to find the best word to describe the new powerful movement. <em>Satyagraha</em>, roughly translated from Sanskrit to mean “Truth-Force,” won the contest. But the word <em>Satyagraha </em>hasn’t entirely caught on&#8230; it doesn&#8217;t really roll off the tongue.</p>
<p style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">In his book, <span style="color: #c05427; font-style: italic;">Nonviolence: 25 Lessons From The History of a Dangerous Idea</span> (meaning &#8220;dangerous” to the status quo) Mark Kurlansky asks what if &#8220;war&#8221; was a non-word? What if the only word for war was <em>&#8220;nonpeace</em>?&#8221; When we would talk about waging <em>nonpeace</em>, our natural question would be, “Why? Why don’t we want peace?” <em>Nonpeace </em>seems abnormal and impotent. It&#8217;s a non-word afterall.</p>
<p style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Kurlansky’s book goes on to explore historical examples of Nonviolence, question some of the reasons people support violence, and delve into the “25 Lessons” &#8212; all of which are summarized at the end of the book. Here are some &#8220;lessons&#8221; we found particularly interesting:</p>
<ul>
<li style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Practitioners of Nonviolence are seen as enemies of the state.</li>
<li style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Once a state takes over a religion, the religion loses its Nonviolent teachings.</li>
<li style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">A rebel can be defanged (made less threatening to the status quo) and can be co-opted by making them into a saint after death.</li>
<li style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Wars do not have to be sold to the general public if they can be carried out by an all-volunteer professional military.</li>
<li style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">A conflict between a violent and a Nonviolent force is a moral argument. If the violent side can provoke the Nonviolent side into violence, the violent side has won.</li>
<li style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Violence does not resolve. It always leads to more violence.</li>
</ul>
<p>Thanks for stopping by.  And thank you for all that you do.</p>
<p>:) matt</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nonviolenceunited.org/2009/11/book-review-nonviolence-25-lessons-from-the-history-of-a-dangerous-idea/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

